99% of Meme Coin Trades Are Doomed to Rekt, Whales Are the Real Winners

By: blockbeats|2025/02/20 15:15:03
0
Share
copy
Original Title: If you are still in the memecoin trenches, pivot to Casino.
Original Author: Foxi (DeFi / AI)
Original Translation: Deep Tide TechFlow

99% of Meme Coin Trades Are Doomed to Rekt, Whales Are the Real Winners

My Meme trading account is currently down by -60%. Am I a terrible trader? Yes, indeed I am. But it's not just due to bad decisions; I would rather believe I am not worse than an average gambler. So, where exactly is the problem? Inspired by @0xngmi's data (who pointed out that the returns from playing Memecoin are even worse than a casino), I decided to delve deeper to see what the root of the issue is.

Firstly, I Admit: I Am a Terrible Meme Trader

Like many newcomers, I've been led by the market hype and emotions, chasing highs, selling lows, frequent trading leading to slippage, and even unknowingly handing money to insider traders in the market.

While this is not my first time in the cryptocurrency market, this experience made me feel like I was playing an unfair game. Worse still, the rules of this game seem to be constantly changing and always favoring those with more information.

@0xngmi calculated the comparison between the expected return (EV) of playing roulette in a casino and the expected return of Memecoin speculation (based solely on transaction fees).

(Original image from @0xngmi, translated by Deep Tide TechFlow)

· The fee for small trades is 2.5%, while Raydium's fee is 0.25%. A speculation requires two transactions, so the fee must be multiplied by 2.

·  Moonshot's default slippage is set at 5%, taking half of this as an estimate for average sandwich attacks.

·  It is difficult to estimate precisely due to significant differences between tokens, assuming a 2.5% cost for each transaction.

This got me thinking: How does Meme speculation compare to actual gambling? Are their odds equally terrible? Or even worse? More importantly, are Meme traders merely casino gamblers disguised as "investors," or are there more complex, more insidious mechanisms at play behind the scenes? According to @0xngmi's analysis, putting money into a casino seems to be a wiser choice than playing with Memes.

True Odds: Memecoin vs. Casino

We need to talk about Expected Value (EV), which is a core concept in both gambling and trading. It tells us, on average, how much money you can expect to win or lose with each bet over time.

Casino games have a kind of "fair unfairness" mathematically. Over the long run, you can always predict how much you will lose. Let's take a closer look:

(Original image by Foxi (DeFi / AI), compiled by Deep Tide TechFlow)

In traditional gambling, the casino profits in a slow and predictable manner. Whether it's each spin of the roulette wheel or each pull of the slot machine's lever, it follows a known probability model. For example, in American roulette, if you bet on red, you have a 47.37% chance of winning and a 52.63% chance of losing. Over time, the casino always wins, but it does not cheat—it simply leverages probability to its advantage. However, to protect gamblers, some jurisdictions mandate a minimum return percentage. For instance, in Ontario, the RTP (Return to Player) of a slot machine must be at least 85%, meaning the casino's edge (i.e., house edge) is at most 15%.

Why 99% of People Lose Money in Memecoin Trading

Unlike the casino, Memecoin trading appears to be a "game of opportunity," but the issue is that you don't even know who the real players are. While the Memecoin market doesn't have a clear "House Edge," through transaction fees, slippage, insider trading, and market manipulation, your funds will still be slowly eroded. Moreover, this erosion is often insidious and challenging to quantify.

Here are the three main reasons that lead to widespread losses among Memecoin investors:

· Transaction Fee

· Slippage

· Market Manipulation

1. Transaction Fee: The Hidden "Maker's Fee"

Every transaction incurs a fee. Whether you are on a centralized exchange (CEX, such as @bitgetglobal or @MEXC_Official), a decentralized exchange (DEX, such as @RaydiumProtocol), or using a trading bot (like @gmgnai, which most people are using), these fees will gradually erode your profits.

CEX Fee: Approximately 0.1% per transaction (buying + selling = 0.2% round-trip fee)

DEX Fee: Approximately 0.3% per transaction, plus Gas fees (each transaction could cost $5-$50+)

Trading Bot Fee: Approximately 1% per transaction, plus priority fees (which could be 4 times the regular DEX fee)

Memecoin Tax: Some projects extract 5%-10% from each transaction as part of a redistribution or burn mechanism. For example, @aipool_tee charges a 10% fee on sell transactions.

These trading bots are earning substantial amounts from retail users. Although the number of people trading Memes has decreased as of now (February 17), daily revenue can still exceed $700,000.

On the surface, 0.2%-1% transaction fees may not seem high, but when you trade frequently every day, these fees quickly add up. Making 10 trades in a day could potentially consume 2%-6% of your principal, which is even more severe than losses from playing European roulette.

2. Slippage (MEV Cost)

Slippage refers to the difference between the expected price of a trade and the actual execution price due to market fluctuations. In Memecoin trading, slippage is particularly severe, especially in cases of low liquidity or high market volatility.

· Example: You try to buy a Memecoin with $100, but due to insufficient liquidity, you actually receive tokens worth $95, resulting in a 5% loss.

· When selling, a similar situation occurs. You plan to sell for $200, but slippage causes you to only receive $190.

· Total slippage loss: approximately 10% of the round-trip transaction cost.

@0xngmi mentioned that about 2.5% of the transaction fee is consumed due to MEV (Sandwich Attack cost), and on the BNB Chain, this cost could be over 5%, attributed to its inferior infrastructure.

A more robust blockchain infrastructure can significantly reduce MEV costs. This is also why many believe Solana is superior to the BNB Chain (I fully agree on this). If @cz_binance wants to promote Meme culture on the BNB Chain, the primary task should be to reduce MEV costs, thereby increasing Memecoin players' expected value (EV).

However, even on Solana, a 2.5%-5% MEV cost is still more severe than losses in a casino game. If you find the house edge on a slot machine to be as high as 10%, you might be furious. But in the Memecoin market, this is not even the worst part.

3. Insider Trading and Market Manipulation

On this point, little needs to be said. Unlike a casino, which has clear rules, the Meme market is entirely skewed towards insiders. No regulation can prevent team wallets, developers, or influencers from conducting "Pump and Dump" schemes to exploit retail traders. For example, the following cases:

· $LIBRA: Took off with tokens worth over $107 million

· $MELANIA: Is it related to Meteroa?

· $CAR: Africa Rugged event

· $CUBA: Another Country's Rugged Event

· $GANG: @mrpunkdoteth Cash Out $10 Million via Fans

· $Broccoli: Manipulated by Scammers and Insiders for Profit

These are just the tip of the iceberg. It can be said that unless you are an insider like @frankdegods, you have virtually no advantage to participate in these Memecoins. In a casino, at least you know what the house edge is, while in the Memecoin market, you don't even know who the house is, but they are definitely taking your money.

Final Comparison: Memecoin Speculation vs. Gambling Expectation Value (EV)

Casino games will slowly drain your funds over time, while Memecoin speculation is much more brutal. One wrong trade could wipe out weeks of gains in an instant. The only motivation to keep participating is the occasional 100x return. However, the actual likelihood of achieving a 100x return is approximately 1/25,000, even lower than the odds of winning the lottery.

People often believe they are "special" or "skilled" (yes, I'm that self-delusional person), but ultimately, they get rekt.

What makes Memecoin not like gambling is that it gives people a sense of illusory control—a misconception that one can make money through research, timing, and skill. Indeed, some traders can profit, but they are the minority, much like professional poker players. The majority of traders, like most gamblers, will ultimately lose.

Advice to On-Chain

If you want to attract users and increase on-chain transaction volume, make sure traders' MEV costs are low enough, and try to reduce transaction fees through cooperation or fund subsidies. Casinos can operate in the long run because gamblers are willing to continue participating.

Advice to Investors

If you are engaging in Memecoin speculation, remember, the house always wins. And you will only realize who the house is when it's too late. If you find yourself unable to disengage, you may already be in a state of gambling addiction.

Original Post Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more