Crypto ETF Welcomes Institutional Onslaught, with 15 Institutions Holding Nearly $14 Billion in Assets

By: blockbeats|2025/02/19 16:15:03
0
Share
copy
Original Title: "Crypto ETF Welcomes Institutional Onslaught, 15 Institutions Hold Nearly $14 Billion in Assets, BlackRock Dominates"
Original Author: Nancy, PANews

Crypto ETFs are rapidly advancing into the mainstream financial world. In addition to the surge in applications for altcoin ETFs, the institutional holding rates of Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs have skyrocketed.

According to reports from The Block and Cryptoslate, as of Q4 2024, institutional investors have shown a significantly increased interest in Ethereum spot ETFs. The institutional holding rate of Ethereum ETFs has surged from 4.8% to 14.5%. At the same time, institutional investors hold 25.4% of the assets under management (AUM) of Bitcoin spot ETFs, totaling $26.8 billion. These institutions saw a 113% increase in their holding rate from Q3 to Q4 in 2024, with the total AUM jumping by 69% to $78.8 billion. With more sovereign nations and corporations beginning to include Bitcoin in their strategic reserves and the increasing expectation for Ethereum ETF staking, the market size of these ETFs is expected to further expand.

This article from PANews has compiled the holdings of 15 institutions in Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs in 2024, covering investment institutions, hedge funds, banks, and pension funds, among others. The cumulative holding value of these institutions exceeds $13.98 billion. Institutions such as Goldman Sachs, Millennium, SIG, and Brevan Howard have holdings in the billions of dollars. Compared to the holdings of mainstream institutions in Bitcoin spot ETFs over multiple quarters in 2024 as previously reported by PANews, the allocation intensity of these institutions has significantly increased. In terms of holding strategy, each institution has different market expectations and asset allocation directions. Several institutions made large-scale increases in the fourth quarter of 2024, with BlackRock's IBIT being particularly attractive. In terms of holding structure, the vast majority of institutions focus on Bitcoin spot ETF products. However, starting from Q4, several institutions have increased their investments in Ethereum ETFs, primarily focusing on BlackRock's ETHA, Fidelity's FETH, and Grayscale's Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH).

Goldman Sachs: IBIT Holding Accounts for 83%, Grayscale ETF Faces Significant Reduction

As of Q4 2024, Goldman Sachs held nearly $23.4 billion in Bitcoin spot ETFs, with IBIT accounting for 83.7% of the holdings, while the rest were in FBTC and GBTC. Compared to previous quarters, Goldman Sachs significantly increased its holdings in IBIT and FBTC while reducing and liquidating holdings in GBTC, BTCO, BITB, ARKB, and BTCW.

Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs also holds over $4.7 billion of Ethereum spot ETF. However, Grayscale's Ethereum Trust (ETH) saw a significant reduction in holdings in the third quarter, while Belldex's ETHA and Fidelity's FETH saw significant increases.

Millennium: Total Holdings Value Exceeding $28 Billion, IBIT and FBTC Preferred

Millennium is one of the world's largest alternative asset management companies. As of Q4 2024, Millennium held nearly $26.2 billion of Bitcoin spot ETF, with IBIT and FBTC accounting for 60.5% and 26.5% of the holdings, respectively, and the rest in BITB, ARKB, GBTC, and BTCO, among others. Compared to the third quarter, Millennium saw the largest increases in holdings for GBTC, IBIT, and BITB, while reducing holdings in FBTC and Grayscale's BTC.

In terms of Ethereum spot ETF holdings, Millennium held a value exceeding $1.8 billion, including ETHA, ETH, FETH, and ETHW. Grayscale's ETH saw a significant reduction in Millennium's holdings in Q4, while ETHA's holdings increased by 156%.

SIG: IBIT Emerges as the Largest Holding, Significant Reduction in Ethereum ETF

Sigma International Group (SIG) is a global quantitative trading firm. As of December 31, 2024, SIG held over $18.9 billion of Bitcoin spot ETF, including IBIT, GBTC, FBTC, and BITO. IBIT saw the highest increase in holdings in the fourth quarter, with an investment value exceeding $14.2 billion, accounting for 75.1% of the total holdings. Additionally, SIG also held around $11.36 million of Ethereum spot ETF, including ETHA, FETH, ETHV, and ETH, but these products all saw double-digit reductions in holdings compared to the previous quarter.

Brevan Howard: Over $14 Billion Invested in Belldex ETF

Brevan Howard is one of the world's largest macro hedge funds, with assets under management reaching $400 billion. As of Q4 2024, Brevan Howard added over $13.8 billion of IBIT this quarter, becoming one of the largest shareholders. Additionally, Brevan Howard also increased its holdings by approximately $94.15 million in ETHA in the fourth quarter.

Capula Investment Management: Position Size Approaching $9.4 Billion, Continues to Accumulate IBIT and FBTC

Capula Investment Management is one of Europe's largest hedge fund management companies. As of Q4 2024, Capula Investment Management holds nearly $9.4 billion worth of IBIT and FBTC, with the institution continuously increasing its holdings since the second quarter.

Schonfeld Strategic Advisors: Position Size Exceeds $9 Billion, Q4 Adds Holding in Ethereum ETF

Schonfeld Strategic Advisors is a hedge fund managing $13 billion in assets. As of December 31, 2024, Schonfeld Strategic Advisors holds $8.5 billion worth of Bitcoin spot ETF, primarily in FBTC, IBIT, and BITB, with varying degrees of accumulation in the fourth quarter. Additionally, Schonfeld Strategic Advisors added a holding of approximately $75.28 million worth of ETHA and FETH in the fourth quarter.

Symmetry Investment: Quarterly Increase in IBIT Holding Surges Over 36 Times

Symmetry Investment is a fund management company with a macro hedge strategy. As of Q4 2024, Symmetry Investment holds $6.7 billion worth of IBIT, a growth of over 36 times compared to the previous quarter.

Avenir Capital: IBIT Holding Accounts for as High as 99%, Significant Reduction in FBTC

Avenir Capital is a family office held by Huobi's founder, Li Lin. As of December 31, 2024, Avenir Capital holds approximately $6 billion worth of BlackRock IBIT and Fidelity FBTC, with IBIT accounting for as high as 99% of the holdings. In comparison to the previous quarters, Avenir Capital chose to increase its IBIT holdings in Q4 2024 and significantly reduce its exposure to FBTC.

Mubadala Investments: Increases Holdings in IBIT by Nearly $440 Million to Become Seventh-Largest Holder

The Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund Mubadala Investments is the second-largest sovereign wealth fund in Abu Dhabi and one of the largest sovereign wealth funds globally.

Mubadala Investments began increasing its holdings in the Bitcoin spot ETF in Q4 2024, becoming the seventh-known holder of IBIT. As of December 31, 2024, Mubadala Investments held 8.235 million IBIT, valued at nearly $4.4 billion.

TudorInvestment: Continues to Increase Stake in IBIT to $430 Million

TudorInvestment is the investment firm owned by billionaire Paul Tudor Jones, managing funds exceeding $10 billion. As of the fourth quarter of last year, TudorInvestment held nearly $430 million of the BlackRock IBIT, a 9.2x increase from Q2's initial position.

State of Wisconsin Investment Board: Holds Over $330 Million Worth of IBIT

The State of Wisconsin Investment Board (SWIB), established in 1951, currently manages over $156 billion in assets, primarily serving the Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) and State Investment Fund (SIF).

As of December 31, 2024, SWIB held 6.06 million shares of BlackRock's IBIT, a 109.7% increase from nearly 2.9 million shares in the previous quarter. Based on the current IBIT price of $55.33, SWIB's holdings are valued at over $330 million. However, SWIB chose to liquidate 1.013 million shares of Grayscale's GBTC in Q2 2024.

LPL Financial: Holdings Exceed $150 Million, Heavily Invested in GBTC and IBIT

LPL Financial is the largest independent broker-dealer in the U.S. As of December 31, 2024, LPL Financial held approximately $140 million worth of Bitcoin spot ETH, primarily in GBTC and IBIT, as well as other investments including Mini Trust BTC, EZBC, and ARKB. In this quarter, LPL Financial increased its holdings of IBIT and EZBC, and added purchases of BTC, BTCW, and BITO. Additionally, LPL Financial also holds $16.39 million worth of ETHE, ETHA, and Grayscale's Mini Trust ETH.

Montreal Bank: Significant Expansion of Investment Portfolio in Q4, IBIT Holds Major Share

Montreal Bank is the third-largest bank in Canada by market capitalization, with total assets exceeding $1 trillion. As of December 31, 2024, Montreal Bank held approximately $150 million in Bitcoin spot ETF. Of this amount, around $139 million was invested in IBIT, with the remaining dispersed investments in FBTC, ARKB, GBTC, and BITO. While Montreal Bank significantly increased its holdings in IBIT in Q4 2024, it reduced and divested a significant portion of its Bitcoin spot ETF holdings in Q3, including Franklin Templeton's EZBC and Grayscale's Bitcoin Mini Trust BTC.

Additionally, Montreal Bank also held Ethereum spot ETF worth around $3.869 million. In Q4, investments were added in Grayscale's ETHE and BlackRock's ETHA, while Fidelity's FETH and Grayscale's Ethereum Mini Trust ETH were significantly reduced, even fully divested.

Barclay: Holds over $130 Million Worth of IBIT, GBTC Fully Divested

Barclay is one of the largest commercial banks in the UK. As of Q4 2024, Barclay held 2.473 million shares of IBIT, valued at over $130 million. However, the 2,850 GBTC shares purchased by Barclay in Q1 2024 were fully divested in Q3.

Multicoin Capital: Holdings Worth Around $110 Million, Repurchases GBTC

Multicoin Capital is a prominent crypto fund known for its multiple crypto investment theses that have garnered significant market attention. As of Q4 2024, Multicoin Capital held around $110 million worth of Grayscale GBTC and Mini Trust BTC, with GBTC repurchased in this quarter after being fully divested in Q3.

HighTower: Portfolio Size Exceeding $110 Million, Increased Holdings in Multiple Ethereum ETFs in Q4

HighTower is one of the largest registered investment advisors and wealth management firms in the United States, managing $130 billion in assets. HighTower's Bitcoin spot ETF holdings include GBTC, FBTC, IBIT, BITX, and ARKB, totaling nearly $110 million. HighTower significantly increased holdings in HODL and IBIT in the fourth quarter. In terms of Ethereum spot ETF products, HighTower only held around $5 million worth of ETHE, Grayscale Mini Trust ETH, and FETH, with the majority acquired in this quarter.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more