Should I sell the Kaito airdrop, let's see what the community says?

By: blockbeats|2025/02/21 17:15:02
0
Share
copy

On February 20, Kaito Airdrop was officially launched, a AI-driven crypto project backed by top VCs with a valuation of up to 17 billion USD, sparking widespread global community attention. As a representative of the "Yap-to-Earn" model, Kaito rewards users through social media interactions, aiming to take the InfoFi concept to new heights.

According to the information released by Kaito, the core mechanism of this airdrop revolves around "Yap Points." Tokenomics show that 10% of the tokens are initially allocated to the community (56.67% of the total supply is planned for community and ecosystem, 19.5% for long-term incentives), with the rest allocated to the team (35%) and early investors (8.3%). The officials emphasize support for long-term holders and incentivize users through the "HODLer badge" and Genesis NFT bonuses.

After the launch of KAITO, the market performance remained relatively stable. According to market data, compared to some airdrop projects that experienced over 50% price drops on the first day, Kaito's airdrop saw price fluctuations of around 30% on the same day.

Should I sell the Kaito airdrop, let's see what the community says?

However, the community's views on the Kaito airdrop are divided, with both appreciation for the project's generosity and potential, as well as strong dissatisfaction with the expected gap and distribution rules. Based on user feedback on the X platform, BlockBeats summarized the positive and negative evaluations of the Kaito airdrop.

How Does the Community Perceive It?

For many users, the greatest appeal of the Kaito airdrop lies in its "high returns at zero cost" feature. X user @celiawan2 mentioned, "Most users received airdrops of 4-6 figures without spending a penny," making them feel that the Kaito team is more sincere. Especially for ordinary retail and mid-level users, rewards ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars exceeded the expectations of many for a "zero-effort" project. Some even believe that "putting it into other projects would be praised as a team with courage." This view has gained some resonance in the community, especially among users who did not have high expectations for airdrops beforehand.

In addition, some users acknowledge Kaito's value, believing that Kaito has core value by optimizing information through AI. @BroLeonAus believes that, "As a protocol that is already generating revenue and has effectively changed the behavior of a part of the industry ecosystem, this is much more meaningful to me than most ghost chains that repeat the wheel." "Perhaps Kaito is not as good as everyone imagined before, but it should not be as bad as many people criticized tonight," tweeted @bee926cn, expressing optimism about Kaito's future and having already experienced its product, Kaito Pro.

On the other hand, there has also been a fair amount of negative feedback regarding the Kaito airdrop. The main focus of criticism has been on "expectation management" and "distribution rules."

Many users expressed that their expectations were inflated by community discussions prior to the airdrop. @Route2FI mentioned that they were expecting to receive between $50 to $120 in the airdrop, and although it was possible to quickly buy back, they ultimately sold the KAITO airdrop.

@Cary_Zz noted that there was a pre-circulated expectation that "each Yap point would be worth $100 or Genesis NFT holders would receive additional rewards." However, the actual result was that each Yap was worth around $21, with an overall 10% airdrop ratio, far below expectations, leaving the eagerly anticipating community greatly disappointed.

In response, @zijingNFT stated that the expectations for Kaito were overly hyped, with many participating KOLs engaging in social mining for yap, "but now the price of the coin is far from ideal, leading to inevitable FUD." @BroLeonAus shared a similar view, pointing out in a tweet that "more of the backlash comes from the expectation gap," a sentiment that almost pervades all negative comments and has become the focal point of community discussion.

Additionally, netizen @waleswoosh directly shared a meme expressing that the airdrop did not meet expectations. In the image, the skewered lamb chop represents the airdrop expectation, while the puree being fed into the mouth symbolizes reality.

Not only did the returns fall short of expectations, but the "values consideration" set by the project team in the distribution rules of this airdrop has also sparked discontent.

Firstly, Sonic Labs founder Andre Cronje posted on social media saying, "For reasons I will never understand, Coinbase has refused to list S for 8 years. And because I refuse to do anything on Base, I cannot claim the Kaito airdrop."

@hellosuoha pointed out that "consistency of values is a very interesting behavior, whether it is consistent or not, only oneself knows clearly. In the end, those who received a higher proportion are dissatisfied, and those who received less are even more dissatisfied, only those who received an airdrop immediately after registration are content." Furthermore, a netizen joked in the comments section: "How come I never thought that values could also be played with."

It is not just a values issue; the specific distribution ratio of the airdrop has also left the community dissatisfied.

@yuyue_chris posted, saying, "The differentiation in public opinion between top and mid-to-low-level KOLs is quite evident: most top KOLs are not very satisfied; the mid-to-low-level are very appreciative of $KAITO airdrop." @mdzzi also expressed a similar viewpoint, "The victory of mid-to-low-level KOLs; the influence of top-tier KOLs is being exploited," believing that there is a disproportionate return between top contributors and new users.

In response to this, some KOLs have shared their own data. @0xBreadguy mentioned, "It's a bit outrageous that I have to stake $120,000 worth of $KAITO to receive the same badge as someone staking $5 worth."

@0x0funky speculated, "The Yaps score does not scale linearly with the amount of Kaito received," noting that one Yaps point is around 7.5 Kaito, and many conversions of 20 points equate to giving 20 Kaito, "It seems like a basic income and then added based on the Yaps score."

@CyberPhilos speculated on the alignment of values between them and the Kaito team, combining it with a ratio, saying, "Those who flatter Kaito, yap: Kaito is 1:20 or even higher; those who are neutral, yap: Kaito is 1:10; those who have criticized Kaito in the past, yap: Kaito is 1:2."

Furthermore, the rapid selling by airdrop whales (on-chain data shows 7 out of the top 12 have liquidated their holdings) and the lack of a lock-up period have raised concerns in the community about the project falling into a "hype-pump-dump" short-term speculative cycle.

AI Data Tool Token Launch: How's the Performance?

While the community was engrossed in heated discussions about the Kaito airdrop, another AI data tool that had launched its token revealed on the 21st a KOL's received Kaito airdrop amount and the sell-off ratio analyzed by their in-house AI tool. This isn't the first time a data tool has launched a token. Previously, Binance had launched the Launchpad project Crypto data analysis platform Arkham (ARKM), which is also an on-chain data intelligence analysis platform. Arkham uses AI (Ultra Engine) to associate blockchain addresses with real-world entities, offering insights and analysis on transaction behavior.

Read more: "After Arkham, which data tools have yet to launch a token?"

Similar to Kaito, Arkham is also classified as an AI data tool, aiming to tackle the issue of fragmented information in the crypto world through technological means and provide users with "Alpha opportunities." The difference is, Kaito leans more towards social data, while Arkham focuses on on-chain data. So, how is the current situation of Arkham, the first data tool to launch a token? In terms of price, according to market data, $ARKM is currently priced at $0.71, with its all-time high price being $3.12 on March 10, 2024, indicating a price drop of nearly 80%, showing significant volatility. Perhaps due to being categorized under AI projects, its price fluctuates in line with the overall rise and fall of the AI sector.

In the current market environment where the AI sector is performing averagely, can Kaito's TVL after its coin issuance break the silence seen in various AI projects and bring back market enthusiasm? Or will it follow Arkham's old path, experiencing the ups and downs of the entire sector? Alternatively, will it engage in a competition for the ecological niche belonging to AI tools with Arkham? All of this leaves us awaiting eagerly.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more